You’ve all read about the proposed deal. The National Post has a copy of the letter that Ballmer et al sent to the Yahoo board. Here are two paragraphs I found interesting:
1] Ballmer reminds Yahoo that he/Microsoft was right all along (emphasis added)
“In February 2007, I received a letter from your Chairman indicating the view of the Yahoo! Board that “now is not the right time from the perspective of our shareholders to enter into discussions regarding an acquisition transaction.” According to that letter, the principal reason for this view was the Yahoo! Board’s confidence in the “potential upside” if management successfully executed on a reformulated strategy based on certain operational initiatives, such as Project Panama, and a significant organizational realignment. A year has gone by, and the competitive situation has not improved.“
2] Ballmer discuses 1 of 4 areas for synergies. Very cool/interesting that R&D made the list. It’ll be interesting to see what Microsoft does with Yahoo’s PHP investments. Because, at the end of the day, every time someone new uses PHP, a VB angel loses his/her wings. What will happen to Yahoo’s broader OSS use in running its business?:
“Expanded R&D capacity: The combined talent of our engineering resources can be focused on R&D priorities such as a single search index and single advertising platform. Together we can unleash new levels of innovation, delivering enhanced user experiences, breakthroughs in search, and new advertising platform capabilities. Many of these breakthroughs are a function of an engineering scale that today neither of our companies has on its own.”
02.02.08 at 10:13 pm
Indeed only shareholders have something to win from Micro$soft-Yahoo! merge.
This is really a bad news for the web & for Yahoo! employees (many of them will be “sacrified” in the name of “eliminating redundant infrastructure and duplicative operating costs”
;o(
02.15.08 at 11:09 pm
Dear God, please do not allow Microsoft to acquire any “rights” to PHP. Right now, it’s an evolving language, building on concepts far more useful than Visual BASIC. Let us ALWAYS remember that BASIC is an acronym for “Beginner’s All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code”. Emphasis on “BEGINNERS”. BASIC is stupidly simplistic (emphasis on STUPID), definitely not up to the standards of Java or C++ (forget the abortion known as “C-sharp”) or Pascal. And good God, please help convince the world that PHP is better, runs faster, on more platforms, and is more secure, and most of all, FREE.
Do I hate Microsoft? Not at all. Any company that can build an OS like Windows 2000 Professional, that only requires a semi-weekly reboot, that devolves into Windoze XP that “phones home” to ensure against people actually stealing it (laughable, given how well it works as compared to any flavour of Unix), which then further devolves into Vista, (the Mac-wannabee in your PC), God help ‘em (and you if you think it’s as good as Mac, which is utterly abysmal), and still “phones home” for the same laughable reason, welll….
I think that’s enough of this diatribe. If you don’t get the point, you’re hopeless, or a Microsoft employee… oh… same thing.
Bill Whedon