One more thing about the IDC report discussed yesterday. IDC estimates OSS software revenue growing from $1.8B in 2006 to $5.8B in 2011. That’s a 26% growth rate (vs. high single digit growth for the entire SW market).
Of course $5.8B is a big number. It’s a big enough number to ensure that folks at leading OSS vendors & their VCs are going to be “comfortable” when they retire.
Now take that $5.8B as a percentage of the IDC estimated total software market and you get a grand total of 1.8%. Keep in mind this is the 2011 figure. Red Hat, the venerable OSS vendor poster child, was founded in 1993, making 2011 nearly 20 years into the life of the OSS vendor market.
I believe 1.8% is another reason to spend less time thinking about the OSS market as something distinct. Every traditional software vendor is going to add an OSS strategy to their business model. This is the future; 1.8% won’t convince vendors to abandon the business model driving the other 98.2% of market spending on software. Call it a hybrid model if you like, but it’ll just be the ongoing evolution of the software business model. Slow and steady.
It’s completely possible that IDC estimates will be proven wildly wrong. Maybe the actual number will be 4.9% :-)
06.22.07 at 5:11 am
[…] I go on, let me clear something up. My 1.8% comment was not meant to minimize the importance of OSS to the software market or to customers. I disagree […]
07.17.07 at 2:33 pm
[…] is tied to open source. As long as customers relate the two, and the OSS market remains less than 1.8% of the total software market, the value of Red Hat’s brand to Oracle is […]
07.23.07 at 11:50 am
[…] gorilla in the Open Source marketplace. But after everything is said and done, that marketplace is tiny in comparison to the total software market. If you believe in the stock market’s ability to predict a […]
10.19.07 at 1:27 pm
[…] growth vs. 10% growth without considering the base. For context, OSS is only going to represent 1.8% of total software spending by 2011. Is that good? Absolutely. Is it the end of life as we know it in the software market? Difficult to […]
12.02.07 at 11:50 pm
[…] & commercial products. I believe this because I’ve seen this model work already. When I do the math, it’s very difficult to envision commercial software vendors throwing away the business model […]
12.04.07 at 3:51 pm
[…] can’t reconcile that OSS is game changing, yet is only estimated to represent < 2% of customer spending in 2011. The fact that 2011 will be 20 years into the life of the commercial […]
01.08.08 at 5:03 pm
[…] products versus the predicted success of selling support, the latter of which is to represent 1.8% of the 2011 software market. […]
03.17.08 at 9:27 pm
[…] that it the only valid outcome for the software market of tomorrow. I’m just looking at the data. But hey, who can predict the future. […]
04.16.08 at 12:51 pm
[…] that IDC (the premier market forecasting firm in the business) has sized revenue from OSS at $1.8B in 2006, growing 26% to $5.7B in 2011. So, we’d be at $2.3B in OSS revenue by YE2007. Take that and multiply by 5x for the services […]
04.30.08 at 7:09 am
[…] OSS has, or will have. It goes from the wild enthusiasm of Matt Asay to the more moderate view of Savio Rodriguez. As readers of this blog know, I enjoy writing about this kind of things, and would like to provide […]
05.14.08 at 2:15 pm
[…] and make the tough business decisions needed to ensure that OSS isn’t relegated to a small revenue slice of the software industry pie. […]
12.04.08 at 3:42 pm
[…] IT market does this customer set represent? I’d argue it’s significantly less than 2%. Second, what percentage of startups will become large enough to represent a significant (actual or […]
03.27.19 at 8:42 pm
Hi you have a wonderful Posting site It was very easy to post easy to understand